<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for efreax.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://efreax.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://efreax.com</link>
	<description>Webhosting and Blogrolling</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Dealing with Negative Feedback by Biddy</title>
		<link>http://efreax.com/2007/02/08/dealing-with-negative-feedback/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Biddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 16:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://efreax.com/2007/02/08/dealing-with-negative-feedback/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I would be careful about using mutual withdrawl for every negative feedback you ever receive. If a seller has a large number of mutually withdrawns, I tend to feel as a buyer that they're putting a lot of pressure on buyers to agree to this, and/or are likely to deal in retaliatory negging. Both of those things would put me off a seller much more quickly than a few calmly dealt-with negs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be careful about using mutual withdrawl for every negative feedback you ever receive. If a seller has a large number of mutually withdrawns, I tend to feel as a buyer that they&#8217;re putting a lot of pressure on buyers to agree to this, and/or are likely to deal in retaliatory negging. Both of those things would put me off a seller much more quickly than a few calmly dealt-with negs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
